This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayer could not resile from a contractual disclosure facility agreement

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2019

The taxpayer could not resile from his admission of deliberate conduct in a contractual disclosure facility form when appealing against discovery and penalty assessments.  

In March 2015, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) wrote to the appellant to advise that they would be opening a compliance check to review his tax position and requested certain information. The appellant replied to HMRC providing the information requested, including a breakdown of income he received but had not included in a self-assessment return.  

In August 2015, HMRC wrote to the appellant to advise they had reason to suspect that he had committed tax fraud. A copy of code of practice 9 (COP9) was enclosed. HMRC offered the appellant the opportunity to make a full disclosure under the contractual disclosure facility (CDF). In October 2015, the appellant wrote to HMRC enclosing the signed CDF disclosure

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tax Returns Could Not Displace Discovery Assessments
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2019
‘Voluntary’ Returns Were Not ‘Returns’ That HMRC Could Enquire Into
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2018
Information Notice: Documents Were ‘Reasonably Required’ To Check Taxpayer’s Tax Position
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2016
Trust Tax Return Disclosure Did Not Invalidate Discovery Assessment On Life Tenant
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2016
Taxpayers Awarded Costs For HMRC’s Unreasonable Behaviour
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2015