This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayer not responsible for fraudulent agent’s actions in claiming EIS relief when preparing taxpayer’s self-assessment return

By Mark McLaughlin, April 2023

The taxpayer was not responsible for the actions of a fraudulent agent who claimed enterprise investment scheme relief when preparing the taxpayer’s self-assessment returns, and the taxpayer’s appeal against discovery assessments was allowed. 

Summary 

The taxpayer was not responsible for the actions of a fraudulent agent who claimed enterprise investment scheme (EIS) relief when preparing the taxpayer’s self-assessment returns, and the taxpayer’s appeal against discovery assessments was allowed. 

Background 

On 21 September 2016, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issued a self-assessment return filing notice to the appellant for the tax year 2015/16. On 29 September 2016, the appellant’s agent (CACL) emailed the appellant to advise they had requested an authorisation code from HMRC. The appellant was asked to forward the code to CACL when received,

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Lack of assistance given to the taxpayer by HMRC contributed towards grounds for late appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2025
Coronavirus job retention scheme: Support payments were incorrectly based on future agreed earnings which were not actually paid
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2025
Extended time limits applied to assessments under the ‘requirement to correct’ regime
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2023
Tribunal refused HMRC's application for appellant's appeal to be struck out
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2021
Travel and subsistence payments on changes in work locations were taxable
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020