This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayer was not entitled to support payments as he was not self-employed in the relevant periods

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026

The taxpayer was not self-employed so was not eligible for payments under the Coronavirus self-employment income support scheme (SEISS) and assessments had been validly raised by HMRC to recover the support payments. 

The appellant declared self-employment income in his tax return for 2018/19, stating he worked as a ‘pPipefitter’. He was invited to claim self-employment income support scheme (SEISS) grants due to the profits of this trade in 2018/19 being chargeable to income tax under ITTOIA 2005, Pt 2. The appellant applied for three support payments through the SEISS, between May 2020 and December 2020. Three SEISS support payments were made to him.   

On 15 December 2020, the appellant submitted his tax return for 2019/20, which&nbsp

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Extended time limit discovery assessments were valid as taxpayer’s behaviour was deliberate
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Arrangements for issue of shares were disqualifying so authority to issue SEIS compliance certificates refused
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2024
What is the ‘quality’ of residence?
By Meg Saksida, January 2023
Discovery provisions did not apply for the purpose of assessing the high income child benefit charge
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Transfer of business not subject to transfer of assets abroad provisions
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2020