This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayer was not entitled to support payments as he was not self-employed in the relevant periods

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026

The taxpayer was not self-employed so was not eligible for payments under the Coronavirus self-employment income support scheme (SEISS) and assessments had been validly raised by HMRC to recover the support payments. 

The appellant declared self-employment income in his tax return for 2018/19, stating he worked as a ‘pPipefitter’. He was invited to claim self-employment income support scheme (SEISS) grants due to the profits of this trade in 2018/19 being chargeable to income tax under ITTOIA 2005, Pt 2. The appellant applied for three support payments through the SEISS, between May 2020 and December 2020. Three SEISS support payments were made to him.   

On 15 December 2020, the appellant submitted his tax return for 2019/20, which&nbsp

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Dividends of a capital nature from a non-UK resident company were liable to income tax
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Payments to personal service company partly related to image rights which were outside the scope of IR35
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2025
Failure by the agent’s employees to lodge appeals was not an acceptable reason for an application to admit late appeals
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2023
Conflicting and unclear information from HMRC was reasonable excuse for late filing of return
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2021
Determinations of PAYE and decisions for NIC purposes affirmed as made to HMRC’s best judgement
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020