This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayer who relied on non-genuine case law generated by AI did not have reasonable excuse for failure to notify chargeability

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2024

Cases cited in the taxpayer’s appeal which were generated by artificial intelligence were not genuine and the taxpayer’s mental health issues and ignorance of the law were not reasonable excuses for her failure to notify chargeability to tax on a property disposal.

In 2006, the appellant purchased a property (SR) for £135,000. SR was let out to tenants from 2007. The appellant did not notify HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) that she was liable to tax on the rental income. She had never previously completed a tax return. In October 2018, SR was sold for £252,000. The solicitors did not provide the appellant with any advice about capital gains tax (CGT). However, she was aware that there would “…possibly be some tax to pay” and that HMRC “would want money”. Having estimated the CGT payable, the appellant put £20,000 into government bonds. In July 2022, HMRC issued a CGT assessment and charged a penalty of%

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Place of effective management of trusts was in the UK
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2025
Capital loss relief for loans to traders not due following capitalisation of loan
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025
Invalid claim for entrepreneurs’ relief was made carelessly for penalty purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2024
Disposal of guarantee rights did not equate to a disposal of shares
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2021
Dwelling occupied for only 6-8 weeks was eligible for relief
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2021