This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayers’ behaviour was not fraudulent/deliberate but was negligent/careless

By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020

The taxpayers’ behaviour was held to be negligent/careless and not fraudulent/deliberate for discovery assessment time limit and penalty purposes. 

HMRC opened enquiries into the appellants’ self-assessment returns for the tax year 2012/13. For that tax year, the first appellant had income from his self-employment as a mini-cab driver and from property. The second appellant had income arising from property. Both declared profits from those activities in that tax year.  

HMRC considered that the appellants’ income was under-declared for 2012/13. Using the presumption of continuity, HMRC also considered adjusting the profits for the tax years 2011/12 back to 1996/97, by uplifting the declared property ‘profits’. HMRC considered that the errors in the returns were due to deliberate actions and assessed

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tribunal refused HMRC’s application for taxpayer’s appeal to be struck out
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
Ignorance of the law by a foreign national was not a reasonable excuse for late tax return
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2025
Licence fees were not ‘income’ following the application of the Ramsay principle
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2025
Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider an individual’s domicile status in an information notice appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021
HMRC had the right to ask questions in an informal investigation
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020