This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayers could not rely on double tax treaty relief from transfer of assets abroad liability

By Mark McLaughlin, June 2020

The appellants were unable to rely on the ‘motive test’ exemption or double taxation treaty relief from liability under the transfer of assets abroad anti-avoidance provisions. 

In November 2002, a non-UK resident company (SAP) entered into an agreement to purchase the bulk of a property. Up to that point, SAP had only undertaken property investment. However, the purchase of the property would have resulted in SAP coming within the UK tax net and would have ‘tainted’ the structure of which it formed part.  

Following professional advice: (1) A company (ABP) was incorporated in Mauritius; (2) ABP purchased the property instead of SAP and undertook the development; (3) The appellants each took out a life policy with Credit Suisse Life & Pensions (Bermuda) Ltd (CSLP),

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

No requirement for income tax to be avoided for ‘transfer of assets abroad’ rules to apply
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2022
Taxpayer was not the transferor for transfer of assets abroad purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2019
Transfers Of Assets Abroad Provisions Applied To Arrangements Involving Property Development
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2019
Scheme Arrangements Were Notifiable Under DOTAS
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2018