This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayer’s relationship was one of self-employment and not employment

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2021

The taxpayer’s relationship with a firm was one of self-employment and not employment during his period of engagement.  

Summary 

The taxpayer’s relationship with a firm was one of self-employment and not employment during his period of engagement. 

Background 

The appellant (GP) started working with a company (C&G) at the end of May 2010. C&G was a broker and provided niche bespoke insurance products. GP and C&G parted company in around May 2013. There was no signed written contract in respect of GP’s engagement with C&G. 

GP worked predominantly from home, at the Lloyd’s Building in London, or at the offices of the insurers with whom he was negotiating. C&G was based in Leeds. GP did not have a desk allocated for his use in the Leeds office, nor was he given a staff

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Travel expenses were not deductible as they were for ordinary commuting
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2026
Discovery assessment was validly made and taxpayer’s case prepared using AI did not give grounds to allow an appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Share buybacks on which EIS disposal relief was claimed were within the transactions in securities regime
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2024
Taxpayer had reasonable excuse for failing to notify HICBC
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2023
Release of overdrawn directors’ loan account occurred upon execution of a settlement agreement
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2023