This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayer’s Stay At Property Was Insufficient To Make It A ‘Residence’

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2019

Capital gains tax private residence relief was not due on the taxpayer’s disposal of a property as her stay there was not sufficient to amount to ‘residence’ for relief purposes. 
 
The appellant purchased a one-bedroom flat (LB) on 20 September 2007, with settlement on 2 November 2007, for £50,000. It was sold, following renovations, on 23 April 2008 with settlement on 1 May 2008 for £115,000, realising a capital gain. The appellant did not declare the gain, on the basis that private residence relief was due (under TCGA 1992, s 222).  
 
On 2 September 2014, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) commenced an enquiry into the appellant’s acquisition and disposal of LB. On 12 November 2015, HMRC issued a discovery assessment for the tax year 2008/09 charging CGT on the gain arising from the appellant’s disposal of LB. A penalty was also imposed for failing to notify

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Period of ownership commenced when a new dwelling was built
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2022
Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider HMRC’s refusal to apply a concession
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2020
Property was only or main residence for entire ‘period of ownership’
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2020
Property Was A ‘Residence’ Despite Short Period Of Occupation
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2017
Private Residence Relief And Lettings Relief Available On Disposal Of Individual’s Residence Of 52 Days
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2016