This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

The business of providing serviced offices was wholly or mainly of making or holding investments

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2025

The nature of a company’s business of providing serviced offices was such that its business consisted wholly or mainly of making or holding investments, such that no business property relief was due for inheritance tax purposes. 

Summary 

The nature of a company’s business of managing serviced offices was such that its business consisted wholly or mainly of making or holding investments, such that no business property relief (BPR) was due for inheritance tax (IHT) purposes. 

Background 

The deceased (DLB) died on 18 September 2018. The appellant executors claimed BPR on the basis that DLB’s shares in a company (F) were relevant business property. The appellants claimed that F’s business consisted wholly or mainly of being the holding company of another company (N) whose business did not fall within IHTA 1984, s 105(3).  

F owned the

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Additional trust property was excluded property notwithstanding that settlor became deemed UK-domiciled
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Transfer of reversionary interest did not involve excluded transfer
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2023
Beneficial interest in a property was not held by uncle and nephew in equal shares as tenants in common
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021
Omission to exercise rights to take lifetime pension benefits was a transfer of value
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2020
Avoidance: ‘Home loan scheme’ unsuccessful as house sale to trustees was void
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2020