This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

The expenditure on various structures of a hydroelectric power generation scheme was allowable

By Mark McLaughlin, May 2021

The Court of Appeal dismissed HMRC's appeal against the decision of the Upper Tribunal (UT) that expenditure on various structures of a hydroelectric power generation scheme was eligible for plant and machinery capital allowances, apart from the tribunal's conclusion on one particular category of expenditure. 

Summary

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) against the decision of the UT that expenditure on various structures of a hydroelectric power generation scheme was eligible for plant and machinery capital allowances, apart from the tribunal's conclusion on one particular category of expenditure.

Background

The company (SSEG) claimed capital allowances on fixed asset expenditure in relation to the Glendoe Hydroelectric Power Scheme. Following enquiries by HMRC, various closure notices for the years ending 31 March 2006 to 31 March 2012

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Director’s loan account was not written off when HMRC claimed it had been
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2024
Appeal struck out as company that adopted cash basis of accounting had no reasonable prospect of success
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2023
Delays in obtaining trust deed from trustees was not a reasonable excuse
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Information about professional advice was not reasonably required by HMRC to determine if penalties were due
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2021
Professional advice was a reasonable excuse for the late submission of returns
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020