This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

The expenditure on various structures of a hydroelectric power generation scheme was allowable

By Mark McLaughlin, May 2021

The Court of Appeal dismissed HMRC's appeal against the decision of the Upper Tribunal (UT) that expenditure on various structures of a hydroelectric power generation scheme was eligible for plant and machinery capital allowances, apart from the tribunal's conclusion on one particular category of expenditure. 

Summary

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) against the decision of the UT that expenditure on various structures of a hydroelectric power generation scheme was eligible for plant and machinery capital allowances, apart from the tribunal's conclusion on one particular category of expenditure.

Background

The company (SSEG) claimed capital allowances on fixed asset expenditure in relation to the Glendoe Hydroelectric Power Scheme. Following enquiries by HMRC, various closure notices for the years ending 31 March 2006 to 31 March 2012

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

HMRC did not have the right to tax payments under the UK/Canada double tax treaty
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2025
Director’s loan account was not written off when HMRC claimed it had been
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2024
Company did not meet R&D project tests and failed to prove sums claimed were spent on the project
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2024
Intra-group loan had an unallowable purpose
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2023
Taxpayer was not the transferor for transfer of assets abroad purposes 2021
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021