This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Transfer to connected party was a ‘disposal’ and there was no bare trust or implied trust

By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020

The transfer of property to a connected party to raise a mortgage was a ‘disposal’ for capital gains tax purposes, the bare trust provisions did not apply to the transfer and there was no implied trust in relation to it.  

A property in London was jointly owned by the appellant (‘A’) and one of his brothers (‘S). The property was subject to restraint orders, which prevented the appellant from raising funds by securing a mortgage on the property. In May 2012, the High Court granted variations to the restraint orders to permit the sale of the property. The property was sold to a company owned by a relative (‘MIS’). The Land Registry form TR1 reported its transfer on 31 May 2012 for £499,000. 

The appellant ceased reporting rents from the property on his self-assessment returns from 31 May 2012.

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Relief allowed despite shareholder holding less than 5% of company’s ordinary share capital
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2024
Values of leasehold interests in care homes were their open market value reflecting trading potential
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2022
HMRC’s calculation of penalties was incorrect
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2022
Individuals were required to be settlement beneficiaries for a one-year period
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2021
Sale of cricket ground involved the disposal of business goodwill
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2019