This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Two dwellings amalgamated into single residence were not each entitled to relief from SDLT higher rate

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2021

Two apartments bought from different vendors a few weeks apart with the intention of amalgamation to form a single residence were not each intended to be the purchaser’s only or main residence for the purpose of SDLT higher rate relief for replacement residences. 

The appellants paid stamp duty land tax (SDLT) at the rate applicable to ‘higher rates transactions’ on each purchase of a residential property (Number 31) and adjoining property (Number 38) on 24 May 2017 and 6 June 2017 respectively. On 5 June 2018, the appellants sold their previous residence.  

On 30 July 2018, the appellants submitted a request for repayment of the higher rates on additional residential properties, seeking to amend the SDLT return for each of Number 31 and Number 38. Following enquiries into both returns,

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Multiple dwellings relief: Part of a residential property was not suitable for use as a single dwelling
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2021
HMRC failed to complete discovery assessment procedure
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2019
Mistake In Return Was Not A Reasonable Excuse For Its Late Filing
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2016
Company’s Appeal Against Liability On Acquisition Of Former Chelsea Barracks Allowed
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2016
Retrospective Legislation Did Not Breach Human Rights
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2015