This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was import VAT due or had it been accounted for through postponed VAT accounting?

By Andrew Needham, April 2026

The appellant appealed two post-clearance demand notices in the total amount of £320,251.68, for VAT, which HMRC asserted was unpaid and unaccounted for in relation to goods imported into the UK by the appellant between 28 January 2022 and 4 February 2023. 

The appellant was incorporated and registered for VAT in March 2019. UK Best Cosmetics Ltd (UK Best), an associated business, was incorporated and registered for VAT in 2021 and began to trade. The appellant did not make any taxable supplies after August 2021 and deregistered for VAT with effect from 28 September 2021. FF Customs and Logistics Ltd (FFCLL) was appointed to be the Direct Customs agent for UK Best using the EORI number belonging to the appellant.  

FFCLL made 371 C88 import declarations using the appellants EORI and claimed PVA for goods imported during the period in the amount of 

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Should a wicker food hamper be treated as a separate standard-rated supply or part of a composite supply of foodstuffs?
By Andrew Needham, June 2026
Did the appellant have a reasonable excuse for submitting her returns late?
By Andrew Needham, December 2024
Was the provision of accommodation and catering ancillary to the supply of welfare services?
By Andrew Needham, May 2021
Was VAT due on excess charges on car parking?
By Andrew Needham, April 2021
Was the appellant required to register and account for VAT in the UK on mail order sales to UK customers?
By Andrew Needham, February 2021