This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was input tax fully recoverable when a taxpayer received subsidies?

By Andrew Needham, August 2021

This was an appeal by the appellant against HMRC’s decision to disallow a proportion of his input tax on the basis that it related to outside the scope subsidies. 

The appellant operated a business in which he generated hot air from burning wood chips. The hot air was used to dry wood chips and other materials belonging to him or others, and the appellant either sold the dried materials, retained them for burning himself or charged third parties for drying their own materials. He also received periodical support payments (PSPs) under the Renewable Heat Incentive scheme for Northern Ireland (the ‘RHI scheme’). The appellant had prepared his VAT returns on the basis that all of the input tax which he had incurred on supplies made to him was deductible input tax. 

At all material times, the sales made by the appellant’s biomass business (of

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was the supply of treatment for female baldness a zero-rated supply of medical services for the treatment of a disability?
By Andrew Needham, March 2026
Was the sale of passes to visitors to London a voucher and therefore outside the scope of VAT at the time of issue or the sale of a ticket which was standard-rated at the time of issue?
By Andrew Needham, October 2024
Was the Respondent making exempt supplies of education?
By Andrew Needham, March 2021
Was the provision of education and/or vocational training by the appellant provided free of charge to students and funded by grants from two government funding agencies is a “supply of services for consideration”?
By Andrew Needham, February 2021
Was the appellant entitled to adjust its DGT figure more than 4 years after the debt became due?
By Andrew Needham, March 2020