This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the method of assessing under-declared output reasonable and was the assessment made to best judgment?

By Andrew Needham, January 2021

Summary 

This was an appeal against a Personal Liability Notice issued to the appellant under paragraph 19 of Schedule 24 to the Finance Act 2007 in the amount of £31,933.30 for the VAT accounting periods 11/15 to 08/17, on the grounds that he had continued to submit VAT returns using Cash Accounting HMRC had withdrawn permission to use that basis.  

Background 

The appellant was a director of PMR Limited (‘PMR’), Castle Developments (Wales) Limited (‘CDW’) and Court Estates & Developments Limited (‘CED’). Initially there were other directors of CDW but by the time of the events under consideration the appellant was the sole director of all three companies. 

In July 2007, PMR was engaged to carry out the project management of a development site which consisted of 26 residential properties, whilst CDW was

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was the supply of fuel with plant hire a single composite supply or a multiple supply?
By Andrew Needham, January 2025
Were two Land Rover Discovery vehicles subject to the self-supply when converted from commercial vehicles into cars?
By Andrew Needham, June 2024
Was the supply of accommodation exempt residential accommodation or in a ‘hotel or similar establishment’?
By Andrew Needham, February 2024
Was bad debt relief available on historic bad debts?
By Andrew Needham, May 2021
Was VAT due on excess charges on car parking?
By Andrew Needham, April 2021