This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Agreements Could Be Rectified To Enable Relief Claim

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2016
Summary

The High Court allowed a claim to rectify two share agreements to increase the number of shares transferred by them, so that the entrepreneurs’ relief conditions could be satisfied on a subsequent disposal of the shares.

Background

The claimant trustees of a settlement (the ‘1968 settlement’) entered into two agreements to sell to each of the two defendants 25,000 shares in a company for £500,000. The defendants were also life tenants of the 1968 settlement and another settlement (the ‘1987 settlement’), and were the settlor’s grandchildren.

Before the agreements were entered into, the majority of the company’s shares (1,200,000 in total) were beneficially owned by the 1968 settlement (600,000 shares), the 1987 settlement (300,000 shares) and the settlor (300,000 shares). These were 'A' ordinary shares with a
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

5% test not satisfied and the shortfall was not held on trust for taxpayer
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2022
Activities constituted a business but not a trade
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2020
Cumulative preference shares were ‘ordinary share capital’
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2019
Shares With No Right To Dividends Were Not ‘Ordinary Shares’
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2016
Officer Or Employee Condition Was Not Satisfied
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2016