This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Shares With No Right To Dividends Were Not ‘Ordinary Shares’

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2016
Summary

Redeemable shares with no right to dividends were not ‘ordinary share capital’ for entrepreneurs’ relief purposes, and were therefore not required to be taken into account in determining whether the company was the taxpayers’ ‘personal company’ for relief purposes.

Background

The appellants (husband and wife) established a company in August 2004, and each held 33 ordinary £1 shares out of the company’s issued share capital of 100 ordinary shares. The shareholders who held the remaining 34 shares later lent £30,000 to the company as a directors’ loan. In June 2006, the loan was converted into 30,000 non-voting redeemable shares of £1 each.

In autumn 2009, the 30,000 non-voting redeemable shares were redeemed at par. On 1 January 2010, a large enterprise acquired all of the 100
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

LLP had not traded in the relevant period prior to the disposal of an interest in it
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2022
Deferred Shares Were ‘Ordinary Shares’ For Relief Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2016
Officer Or Employee Condition Was Not Satisfied
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2016
Agreements Could Be Rectified To Enable Relief Claim
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2016
No Relief On Disposal of Syndicate Capacity By A Name At Lloyd’s
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2015