This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

No Relief On Disposal of Syndicate Capacity By A Name At Lloyd’s

By Mark McLaughlin, July 2015
Background

The appellant carried on a trade as a Name at Lloyd's. In the year ended 31 December 2009, the appellant was an underwriter participating in 18 Lloyd’s syndicates. He sold his capacity in one of those syndicates (syndicate 958) in July 2009 (syndicate capacity became a tradable asset in 1995, except in syndicates being established for the first time). 

The appellant claimed entrepreneurs’ relief in his 2009/10 tax return, in respect of the disposal of that syndicate capacity. However, following an enquiry into his return, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) rejected the entrepreneurs’ relief claim. The appellant appealed.

He contended (among other things) that the disposal of his capacity in syndicate 958 was a disposal of ‘part of a business’ for entrepreneurs’ relief purposes (within TCGA 1992, s 169I(2)(a)). It was argued that before the sale, the
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

5% test not satisfied and the shortfall was not held on trust for taxpayer
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2022
LLP had not traded in the relevant period prior to the disposal of an interest in it
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2022
Activities constituted a business but not a trade
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2020
No Relief Due On Partial Disposal Of Business Premises
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2016
Deferred Shares Were ‘Ordinary Shares’ For Relief Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2016