This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Company Was A Small Or Medium Sized Enterprise Entitled To Enhanced Relief

By Mark McLaughlin, October 2015
The appellant company (M) claimed research and development (R&D) tax deductions at the rate applicable to a ‘small or medium-sized enterprise’ (SME) (as defined in CTA 2009, s 1119(1)) for its accounting periods ended 30 September 2010 and 30 September 2011 respectively (under CTA 2009, s 1044).

43.75% of the ordinary shares and 26.22% of the voting rights of M were held by a company (W), which was a 100% subsidiary of Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) at the relevant time, as the result of an earlier ‘debt for equity swap’.

Following enquiries by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), closure notices were issued determining that M was not entitled to the R&D relief claimed, as W was a ‘partner enterprise’, which was neither an institutional investor nor a venture capital company, so that M could not be treated as qualifying for relief as an SME. M appealed. 

The First
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tribunal could not consider HMRC’s refusal of a claim for R&D tax credits on the grounds of unreasonableness and unfairness
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2022
Company was entitled to enhanced R&D relief as expenditure was not subsidised
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2022
Claimant failed to demonstrate a qualifying activity for R&D relief purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2022
Company Was Entitled To Relief As A Small Or Medium-Sized Enterprise
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2015