This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Claimant failed to demonstrate a qualifying activity for R&D relief purposes

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2022

The activity in respect of which the appellant’s expenditure was incurred did not qualify as research and development because the appellant failed to establish that the activity involved a project seeking to achieve a technological advance through the resolution of a technological uncertainty.

The appellant, a small company which sought to match providers and customers of digital learning services, incurred expenditure on the intended creation of a platform which would take into account a learner’s prior experience and specific learning goal in offering learning content.

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tribunal could not consider HMRC’s refusal of a claim for R&D tax credits on the grounds of unreasonableness and unfairness
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2022
Company was entitled to enhanced R&D relief as expenditure was not subsidised
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2022
Company Was A Small Or Medium Sized Enterprise Entitled To Enhanced Relief
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2015
Company Was Entitled To Relief As A Small Or Medium-Sized Enterprise
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2015