This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Formula Was Appropriate Method Of Apportioning Consideration Paid For Qualifying Assets

By Malcolm Gunn, April 2015
Background

The appellant company purchased a retirement home in September 2004 for £940,000. Within the grounds of the property was a swimming pool for use by residents of the nursing home. The swimming pool was enclosed by a large conservatory-type covering.

The appellant and HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) agreed that capital allowances were due on the swimming pool. However, HMRC refused the appellant’s capital allowances claim in relation to the conservatory. In addition, HMRC reduced the appellant’s capital allowances claim in respect of the swimming pool using an apportionment formula, and using a valuation of the swimming pool (£45,596) that was lower than the valuation used by the appellants (£84,000). The appellants appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) therefore had to consider the following issues for capital allowance purposes: whether the conservatory
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Expenditure on various structures of a hydroelectric power generation scheme was allowable
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2020
Fixture acquisition costs could be apportioned on a just and reasonable basis
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2019
Obtaining Writing Down Allowances Was A Main Object Of Transactions
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2015
Laundry Building Was Used For The Purposes Of A Trade
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2014
Tribunal Decision To Allow Taxpayer’s Appeal Against HMRC’s Denial Of Allowances Was ‘Unsafe’
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2014