This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Fixture acquisition costs could be apportioned on a just and reasonable basis

By Mark McLaughlin, May 2019

A capital allowances claim for the purchase of fixtures was not determined by the allocation of the acquisition costs in the agreement between the parties but on a ‘just and reasonable’ basis subject to a cap by reference to the expenditure incurred by the vendor on those assets.  

In March 2005, a residential care home business (KCH) purchased a freehold property. The total amount of capital costs on fixtures claimed by KCH in its returns for capital allowances purposes in relation to the property, up to and including 28 February 2009, was £238,912. In the accounting period ended 28 February 2010, the residual value of KCH’s main pool was £85,504. In or around February 2010, KCH went into administration; no capital allowances were claimed by KCH in the accounting period ended 28 February 2011.

In May 2011, the appellant company purchased the

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Expenditure on various structures of a hydroelectric power generation scheme was allowable
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2020
Obtaining Writing Down Allowances Was A Main Object Of Transactions
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2015
Former Church Was A Qualifying Building For Business Premises Renovation Allowance Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2015
Formula Was Appropriate Method Of Apportioning Consideration Paid For Qualifying Assets
By Malcolm Gunn, April 2015
Laundry Building Was Used For The Purposes Of A Trade
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2014