This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Information Requested In Code Of Practice 9 Enquiries Was Reasonably Required

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2018
Information requested in Code of Practice 9 enquiries was reasonably required by HMRC and the First-tier Tribunal had no jurisdiction to close the enquiries.

In January 2016, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) opened an enquiry (under TMA 1970, s 9A) into the first appellant’s tax return for 2013/14. HMRC also wrote to the appellants informing them that HMRC intended enquiring into their tax affairs under Code of Practice 9 (COP9) and pointed out that the appellants had a time-limited opportunity to sign a contractual disclosure facility (CDF).

In April 2016, as there had been no response from the appellants by the end of the 60-day period given to accept or reject the CDF, HMRC wrote to the appellants giving the CDF rejection letter (as is the policy when no response received). At the same time, HMRC issued information notices to each of the appellants (under FA 2008, Sch 36, para 1), requesting information relating to several
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Discovery assessments were not made to HMRC’s best judgment
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2019
Taxpayer’s ‘involuntary’ self-assessment registration was a special circumstance in late filing penalty appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2019
Tax Returns Could Not Displace Discovery Assessments
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2019
Reliance On Accountants To Submit Return Was Reasonable Excuse For Late Filing
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2018
HMRC’s Decision Not To Suspend Penalty Was Not Flawed
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2016