This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Information Requested In Code Of Practice 9 Enquiries Was Reasonably Required

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2018
Information requested in Code of Practice 9 enquiries was reasonably required by HMRC and the First-tier Tribunal had no jurisdiction to close the enquiries.

In January 2016, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) opened an enquiry (under TMA 1970, s 9A) into the first appellant’s tax return for 2013/14. HMRC also wrote to the appellants informing them that HMRC intended enquiring into their tax affairs under Code of Practice 9 (COP9) and pointed out that the appellants had a time-limited opportunity to sign a contractual disclosure facility (CDF).

In April 2016, as there had been no response from the appellants by the end of the 60-day period given to accept or reject the CDF, HMRC wrote to the appellants giving the CDF rejection letter (as is the policy when no response received). At the same time, HMRC issued information notices to each of the appellants (under FA 2008, Sch 36, para 1), requesting information relating to several
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

HMRC had the right to ask questions in an informal investigation
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2019
Taxpayer was set up for self-assessment without his knowledge
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2019
Partnership Tax Return Late Filing Penalties Cancelled As There Was No Partnership
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2018
Tax Return Errors Were Deliberate For Penalty Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2017
Employer’s Errors In End Of Year Returns Not Liable To Penalties For Inaccuracies
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2016