This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

HMRC’s Decision Not To Suspend Penalty Was Not Flawed

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2016
HMRC’s decision not to suspend a penalty for a careless error in the appellant’s tax return was not flawed. 

The appellant, a company director shareholder and employee, omitted pay and tax from the company in his tax return for 2012/13, resulting in a tax underpayment.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) opened an enquiry into the return, and subsequently issued a penalty assessment (under FA 2007, Sch 24) on the basis that the appellant’s error was ‘careless’.

The appellant’s agents accepted responsibility for the error in his tax return, and suggested conditions for the penalty to be suspended (under Sch 24, para 14). Those conditions included: maintaining all documentation relating to his PAYE employment, including payslips, form P60 and if applicable form P11D; the appellant would maintain a separate record of his annual pay and tax deductions; all documentation
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Dispute over legal professional privilege could not be dealt with in a separate tribunal hearing
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2022
Taxpayer could not resile from a contractual disclosure facility agreement
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2019
Follower notice: Taxpayer not liable to penalty for failing to take corrective action
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2019
‘Voluntary’ Returns Were Not ‘Returns’ That HMRC Could Enquire Into
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2018
Extended Time Limit Discovery Assessments Could Not Be Set Aside On Human Rights Grounds Following Taxpayer’s Death
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2016