This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

HMRC’s Decision Not To Suspend Penalty Was Not Flawed

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2016
HMRC’s decision not to suspend a penalty for a careless error in the appellant’s tax return was not flawed. 

The appellant, a company director shareholder and employee, omitted pay and tax from the company in his tax return for 2012/13, resulting in a tax underpayment.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) opened an enquiry into the return, and subsequently issued a penalty assessment (under FA 2007, Sch 24) on the basis that the appellant’s error was ‘careless’.

The appellant’s agents accepted responsibility for the error in his tax return, and suggested conditions for the penalty to be suspended (under Sch 24, para 14). Those conditions included: maintaining all documentation relating to his PAYE employment, including payslips, form P60 and if applicable form P11D; the appellant would maintain a separate record of his annual pay and tax deductions; all documentation
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

HMRC’s allocation of tax payments was not unreasonable
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2020
HMRC had the right to ask questions in an informal investigation
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2019
No Late Filing Penalties As RTI Returns Were Filed On Time
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2019
HMRC Were Entitled To Enquire Into Individual Partners’ Tax Returns
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2018
Estimated Assessments And Penalties For Failure To Notify Were Justified
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2017