This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Dispute over legal professional privilege could not be dealt with in a separate tribunal hearing

By Mark McLaughlin, May 2022

The applicants were out of time for a dispute to be heard under procedures set out in regulations on whether certain documents were subject to legal professional privilege, and the First-tier Tribunal had no jurisdiction to decide the issue in a separate hearing, so the dispute must be decided as part of substantive appeals.

In 2002, the applicants entered into certain tax planning arrangements (Mark II flip-flop). In November 2019, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issued the applicants with information notices (under FA 2008, Sch 36). Each notice contained a list of items which referred to one or more documents.

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Partial closure notice could not be issued without specifying the tax due
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2022
Follower and accelerated payment notices quashed as follower notices were invalid
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2020
APNs Issued After HMRC’s Agreement To Postpone Disputed Tax Was Not An Abuse Of Power
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2019
Application For Tax Return Enquiry Closure Notice Granted
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2018
Payroll Was Not An Accountancy Service Requiring Money Laundering Registration
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2015