This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Follower and accelerated payment notices quashed as follower notices were invalid

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2020

The taxpayer’s appeal in respect of follower notices was allowed, as the earlier case law decision on which the follower notices was based would not have denied the taxpayer the tax relief he had claimed.

Background

The appellant was involved with a limited liability partnership ('Eclipse 10'). Eclipse 10's business was the exploitation of film rights. The appellant joined the Eclipse 10 partnership in March 2006, making a contribution of £29,700,000. He financed that contribution by taking out two bank loans. On his self-assessment return for the tax year 2005/06, the appellant claimed interest relief in respect of the loans.

On 8 March 2017, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issued ten follower notices to the appellant (under FA 2014, Pt 4, Ch 2), one for each tax year in which he had claimed interest.

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

HMRC’s allocation of tax payments was not unreasonable
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2020
Tribunal had jurisdiction to approve third-party information notice to non-UK nationals
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2019
Incorrect property expenses claims were not careless for discovery assessment purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2019
Email Exchange With HMRC Did Not Amount To A Binding Contract
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2018
‘Voluntary’ Returns Were Not ‘Returns’ That HMRC Could Enquire Into
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2018