This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Follower and accelerated payment notices quashed as follower notices were invalid

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2020

The taxpayer’s appeal in respect of follower notices was allowed, as the earlier case law decision on which the follower notices was based would not have denied the taxpayer the tax relief he had claimed.

Background

The appellant was involved with a limited liability partnership ('Eclipse 10'). Eclipse 10's business was the exploitation of film rights. The appellant joined the Eclipse 10 partnership in March 2006, making a contribution of £29,700,000. He financed that contribution by taking out two bank loans. On his self-assessment return for the tax year 2005/06, the appellant claimed interest relief in respect of the loans.

On 8 March 2017, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issued ten follower notices to the appellant (under FA 2014, Pt 4, Ch 2), one for each tax year in which he had claimed interest.

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Information notice requesting private account information was valid
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2019
HMRC Could Not Issue Further Information Notices Seeking The Same Information As Previous Ones
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2019
Estimated Assessments And Penalties For Failure To Notify Were Justified
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2017
Employer’s Errors In End Of Year Returns Not Liable To Penalties For Inaccuracies
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2016
Taxpayer Had A Reasonable Argument That HMRC Should Not Pursue Tax Twice On The Same Profits
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2015