This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Penalties Were Due For Late Accelerated Partner Payments

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2017
The appellant was a member of a film partnership. In October 2014, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) informed the appellant that they would be issuing him with an accelerated partner payment notice (PPN) (pursuant to FA 2014, Sch 32, para 3) for the tax year 2004/05, and stated that the issue of a PPN would trigger an obligation to make an accelerated partner payment within 90 days. 

The PPN for 2004/05 was sent on 14 November 2014, stating that payment was due on or before 17 February 2015, and warning that surcharges would apply for late payment. HMRC subsequently sent a PPN for 2005/06 on 28 November 2014, which also contained information on surcharges. On 10 February 2015, the appellant wrote to HMRC making representations against both PPNs. On 29 June 2015, HMRC wrote to the appellant confirming both PPNs without amendment. 

On 8 July 2015, the appellant wrote to HMRC requesting a “review of your demand for
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Information notices restricted to documents and information from the previous six years
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2020
Loss entries in tax return did not amount to the discovery of an insufficiency
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2019
Discovery Assessments Could Not Be Used To Assess High Income Child Benefit Charge
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2018
First-tier Tribunal Had Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Third Party Information Notice
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2016
Payroll Was Not An Accountancy Service Requiring Money Laundering Registration
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2015