This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Scheme Administrator’s Liability To Scheme Sanction Charges Was Not Just And Reasonable

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2017
The appellant pension scheme administrator’s appeal against HMRC’s decision to refuse to discharge its liability to scheme sanction charges was allowed, as the appellant reasonably believed that no unauthorised payment was being made, and it would not be just and reasonable for it to be liable to the charges.

The appellant unwittingly became party to a complex ‘pension liberation scheme’ involving a self-invested personal pension scheme (SIPP), which was operated by the appellant in its capacity as scheme administrator.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) considered that the SIPP held investments which had been used to enable members of the SIPP to access their pension funds (in the form of obtaining loans) before the age (55 years) at which pension scheme members were permitted to obtain benefits from their pensions, and that attempts had been made to access pension funds in this way in a manner aimed at
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Debt quantified in monetary terms was not a relievable pension contribution
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2022
Information about pension scheme automatic enrolment was inaccurate and opt-out notice was valid
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2022
Unauthorised payments charge and surcharge assessments out of time in the absence of ‘carelessness’
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2020
Discovery assessment was validly made in respect of a pension liberation scheme
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2020
Incentive Plan Shares Released On Termination Of Employment Should Be Valued As Restricted
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2015