This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayers Could Not Challenge Retrospective Legislation Again After Previous Challenge Failed

By Mark McLaughlin, June 2018
The taxpayers could not challenge the retrospective effect of anti-avoidance legislation after the Court of Appeal had previously dismissed an application for judicial review on the same matter.

Summary

The taxpayers could not challenge the retrospective effect of anti-avoidance legislation after the Court of Appeal had previously dismissed an application for judicial review on the same matter. 

Background

The appellants used a tax avoidance scheme, which was designed to take advantage of the double taxation treaty of 1955 between the UK and Isle of Man. The appellants submitted self-assessment returns for each of the tax years 2005/06, 2006/07, and 2007/08 claiming exemption from income tax based on the scheme being effective. However, legislation was introduced retrospectively (in FA 2008, s 58) to make the scheme arrangements ineffective.

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Online tax return filing notice was valid despite notification emails being assumed to be spam and deleted
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2020
Additional liabilities confirmed in the absence of credible evidence
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2020
Penalty Appeal Allowed As HMRC Failed To Prove Tax Return Notice Sent
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2018
Conditions For Discovery Assessment Were Not Satisfied
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2018
No Decision On Whether Penalties Applied To Class 4 NIC
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2017