This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayers Could Not Challenge Retrospective Legislation Again After Previous Challenge Failed

By Mark McLaughlin, June 2018
The taxpayers could not challenge the retrospective effect of anti-avoidance legislation after the Court of Appeal had previously dismissed an application for judicial review on the same matter.

Summary

The taxpayers could not challenge the retrospective effect of anti-avoidance legislation after the Court of Appeal had previously dismissed an application for judicial review on the same matter. 

Background

The appellants used a tax avoidance scheme, which was designed to take advantage of the double taxation treaty of 1955 between the UK and Isle of Man. The appellants submitted self-assessment returns for each of the tax years 2005/06, 2006/07, and 2007/08 claiming exemption from income tax based on the scheme being effective. However, legislation was introduced retrospectively (in FA 2008, s 58) to make the scheme arrangements ineffective.

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Partial closure notice could not be issued without specifying the tax due
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2022
Reliance On Previous Accountants Was A Reasonable Excuse For Late Filing Of Tax Return
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2019
Taxpayer Had No Reasonable Excuse For Late Payment Of Tax In Accelerated Payment Notice
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2017
Parents’ Illness And Death Were Reasonable Excuses For Late Filing Penalty Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2017
Information Was Reasonably Required But Information Notices Varied
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2017