This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the appellant making exempt medical supplies or standard-rated cosmetic surgery?

By Andrew Needham, November 2019

Summary 
 
This was an appeal against the denial of input tax claimed in respect of pre-incorporation legal services. The legal fees were incurred by Mr Derek McKee in respect of a claim against him by a third-party called Jumar Solutions Ltd. The amounts in dispute were £28,876 in relation to the VAT period 08/16 and £2,305 in relation to the period 02/17. 

Background 

In short, HMRC contended that the legal services in question were supplied to Mr McKee in his personal capacity in respect of Jumar’s action against him, all of which occurred prior to the incorporation of the appellant. The input tax in relation to those legal services was not, therefore, allowable as input tax for VAT purposes as regards the appellant. 
 
The appellant’s case was that Mr McKee

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were the supplies received by the appellant within the insurance exemption?
By Andrew Needham, June 2022
Should income from two similar types of gaming machine be treated in the same way or should one be exempt and the other standard rated?
By Andrew Needham, June 2020
Was a payment handling service exempt from VAT?
By Andrew Needham, April 2020
Were Supplies Made By Private Profit Making Welfare Organisations Covered By The Exemption Even Though They Were Not State Regulated?
By Andrew Needham, March 2019
Booking Fees Exempt From VAT
By Andrew Needham, June 2014