This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Should income from two similar types of gaming machine be treated in the same way or should one be exempt and the other standard rated?

By Andrew Needham, June 2020

Summary 

HMRC appealed against two decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) relating to VAT in respect of supplies to retail customers of the ability to play various games of chance on gaming machines. 

Although the two FTT decisions relate to separate appeals on separate issues, the appeal before the Upper Tribunal relates to a single issue which is common to both decisions. The parties requested that the Tribunal provide a single judgment in respect of both appeals. 

In broad terms HMRC submitted that in both decisions the FTT erred in law in relation to the evidence which it took into account in applying the EU test of fiscal neutrality. 

Background 

While supplies of gambling made through section 16/21 machines and through fixed odds betting terminals (“FOBTs”) were treated by HMRC as exempt from VAT, supplies made through section 31/34 machines were

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were the supplies received by the appellant within the insurance exemption?
By Andrew Needham, June 2022
Was the appellant making exempt medical supplies or standard-rated cosmetic surgery?
By Andrew Needham, November 2019
Was the appellant making exempt medical supplies or standard-rated cosmetic surgery?
By Andrew Needham, October 2019
Were Supplies Made By Private Profit Making Welfare Organisations Covered By The Exemption Even Though They Were Not State Regulated?
By Andrew Needham, March 2019
Booking Fees Exempt From VAT
By Andrew Needham, June 2014