This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the appellant making exempt medical supplies or standard-rated cosmetic surgery?

By Andrew Needham, October 2019

This was an appeal against the decision of HMRC that supplies of botulinum toxin (“Botox”) and nail fungus treatment were not exempt under VATA 1994, Sch 9, Group 7 but standard rated as cosmetic surgery and the resulted in assessments totalling £21,064.  

Summary 

This was an appeal against the decision of HMRC that supplies of botulinum toxin (“Botox”) and nail fungus treatment were not exempt under VATA 1994, Sch 9, Group 7 but standard rated as cosmetic surgery and the resulted in assessments totalling £21,064. 

The grounds of appeal were that they were medical procedures and, therefore, exempt from VAT. The appellant stated that Botox is a medical procedure and it employed members of the medical profession to administer and supervise it in all instances. Nail fungus

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was the installation of flexible pre-formed burial vaults exempt as made in connection with the remains of the dead?
By Andrew Needham, July 2022
Was the supply of doctors by an agency an exempt supply of medical services or a standard rated supply of staff?
By Andrew Needham, August 2020
Should income from two similar types of gaming machine be treated in the same way or should one be exempt and the other standard rated?
By Andrew Needham, June 2020
Were Supplies Made By Private Profit Making Welfare Organisations Covered By The Exemption Even Though They Were Not State Regulated?
By Andrew Needham, March 2019
Booking Fees Exempt From VAT
By Andrew Needham, June 2014