This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Arrangements were potentially part of a scheme caught by consortium relief anti-avoidance

By Mark McLaughlin, June 2021

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellants’ appeal against the refusal of an application for a direction that HMRC issue an enquiry closure notice, as there was an ‘arrangement’ for consortium relief purposes and HMRC must continue their enquiry to determine whether that arrangement formed part of a scheme for anti-avoidance purposes.  

The four appellant companies were the subject of enquiries by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) into their corporation tax returns for the periods ended 31 December 2011 to 2013. HMRC’s enquiries related to claims made by the applicants for consortium relief. The question to which HMRC's enquiries were directed was whether there was a scheme caught by an anti-avoidance provision. HMRC requested a great deal of information and numerous documents. The&nbsp

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Charitable company’s payments were loan repayments and not non-charitable expenditure
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2026
HMRC directed to issue tax enquiry closure notices despite a pending Supreme Court decision
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2025
Expenditure was not subsidised and was not incurred in activities contracted out to the company
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2025
SSE unavailable as shares sold were owned by a company in a group for less than 12 months
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2023
Jersey companies were centrally managed and controlled in Jersey and not in the UK
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2019