This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Arrangements were potentially part of a scheme caught by consortium relief anti-avoidance

By Mark McLaughlin, June 2021

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellants’ appeal against the refusal of an application for a direction that HMRC issue an enquiry closure notice, as there was an ‘arrangement’ for consortium relief purposes and HMRC must continue their enquiry to determine whether that arrangement formed part of a scheme for anti-avoidance purposes.  

The four appellant companies were the subject of enquiries by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) into their corporation tax returns for the periods ended 31 December 2011 to 2013. HMRC’s enquiries related to claims made by the applicants for consortium relief. The question to which HMRC's enquiries were directed was whether there was a scheme caught by an anti-avoidance provision. HMRC requested a great deal of information and numerous documents. The&nbsp

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Company liable to penalty of £1m for failing to comply with its obligations under the DOTAS rules
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026
Loss relief was not available in an earlier period than claimed by the company
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2025
Expenditure on preparatory work was eligible for capital allowances
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025
Company was not a loan relationship debtor and no loan was made to a participator
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Deductions not available under the replacement of tools provisions for replacement tractor units and trailers
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2019