This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Companies did not take reasonable care with CIS obligations

By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) did not have jurisdiction to consider whether the conditions were satisfied for relief to be granted from liability for unpaid CIS deductions for periods prior to registration under the scheme, and in any event, the FTT would not have made such a direction as the appellants were not considered to have taken reasonable care.  

The appellant companies (‘NP’ and ‘CT’) were special purpose vehicles set up to purchase and redevelop sites in Liverpool. NP and CT were connected. Both developments involved carrying out construction operations within the ambit of the construction industry scheme (CIS). The appellants engaged sub-contractors to carry out their respective commercial developments and signed contractual agreements with those sub-contractors. The contracts were dated 5 August 2015, 1 March 2016&nbsp&

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Identifiable elements of unfair dismissal claim were non-taxable
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2025
Negligible value claim did not satisfy the requirements for a valid claim
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2023
Forward planning!
By Richard Curtis, January 2023
The taxpayer was prevented from challenging the validity of HMRC’s tax return enquiry
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021
HMRC could not pursue an alternative argument so close to a substantive appeal hearing
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2021