This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Company’s acquisition of residential property was liable to higher rate of SDLT and no exclusions applied

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2025

A company was liable to the higher 15% rate of stamp duty land tax on its acquisition of a residential property occupied by the company’s directors and shareholders and no exclusion from the higher rate applied. 

The appellant (MG) and his wife (RM) were both directors and 50% shareholders of the appellant company (GMR), through which MG and RM ran a property rental business. A property (Rosehill) had been MG and RM’s home for a number of years. GMR bought Rosehill from MG and RM on 18 June 2021. A stamp duty land tax (SDLT) return was submitted and SDLT paid based on the standard residential rates of SDLT applying. Following an enquiry into the SDLT return, HM Revenue and Customs issued a closure notice, increasing the self-assessed SDLT. GMR appealed.  

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found: (1) The transaction was a ‘higher threshold interest’ (under FA 2003, Sch 4A, para 1) because it was a single dwelling for

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Property and annexe comprised two dwellings for multiple dwellings relief purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2026
Partly completed development was residential property at the effective date of the transaction
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025
Enquiry was opened in time and property did not replace only or main residence
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2023
Main house and annex did not each count as a dwelling for multiple dwellings relief purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Houses and land were not ‘mixed use’ but entirely residential property
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021