This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Concept of ‘staleness’ for discovery assessment purposes not followed

By Mark McLaughlin, April 2023

The fact that the Supreme Court’s earlier dismissal of the concept of ‘staleness’ was obiter dicta did not mean that the Upper Tribunal must follow the binding ratio of the Court of Appeal in the same case that the concept of staleness applied to discovery assessments, and the Upper Tribunal also detected no error of law in the First-tier Tribunal’s decision on a partnership’s liability to tax on its entitlement to profits. 

Summary 

The fact that the Supreme Court’s earlier dismissal of the concept of ‘staleness’ was obiter dicta did not mean that the Upper Tribunal must follow the binding ratio of the Court of Appeal (CA) in the same case that the concept of staleness applied to discovery assessments, and the Upper Tribunal also detected no error of law in the First-tier Tribunal’s decision on a partnership’s liability to tax on its entitlement to profits. <>

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Taxpayer was not entitled to support payments as he was not self-employed in the relevant periods
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026
Taxpayer failed to discharge the burden of displacing discovery assessments and penalties were confirmed
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2024
Discovery assessments upheld and ignorance of the law was not a reasonable excuse
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2023
Share options were acquired at the date of grant and not when the shares vested
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2022
Employer did not fail to operate PAYE code correctly
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2020