This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Conditions for valid HMRC discovery assessments were not met

By Mark McLaughlin, November 2024

An appeal against discovery assessments issued following a telephone conversation between an HMRC officer and the appellant was allowed, as there was insufficient evidence that the discovering officer had satisfied either the subjective or objective tests for making a valid discovery.  

The appellant was employed in the water industry. He undertook extensive business mileage and incurred business subsistence expenses on such items as dining and hotels. He paid these from private resources and claimed them back from his employer. He completed expenses sheets, which he would submit to his employer.  

It became apparent to the appellant that the employer was not repaying him all the expenses he incurred from his personal funds. The appellant appointed an agent (A). He forwarded to A the completed expense sheets sent to his employer and instructed A to compile his tax returns. When A completed a tax return it would be sent to the

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Travel expenses were not deductible as they were for ordinary commuting
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2026
Discovery assessments upheld and ignorance of the law was not a reasonable excuse
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2023
Bonus scheme payments were general earnings and not termination payments
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2020
Taxpayers’ behaviour was not fraudulent/deliberate but was negligent/careless
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020
Participant in tax avoidance scheme was the settlor of a settlement
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020