This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Construction industry scheme: Special purpose property development company payments were subject to the CIS

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2020

Payments by a company specially formed to facilitate property development to building contractors were under ‘construction contracts’ and the company was a person to whom FA 2004, s 59 applied as carrying on a business which included construction operations. 

The appellant company was formed in connection with the development of a property in Henley. Ownership of the property was in five separate parts: (1) one part (which was residential) by an individual (S); (2) another part (also residential) by another individual (M); (3) the other three parts by three private companies each owned by S and M (who were also the directors). 

In August 2015, the appellant and the five property owners entered into a development agreement in relation to the property (apart from those parts owned personally&

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

One insufficiency in assessment relating to different errors did not validate the whole assessment for conduct and time limit purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2026
Application for a preliminary hearing about the appellant’s domicile was dismissed.
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
LLPs were trading and were carrying on a trade with a view to profit
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021
Prestige cars were made available to director for benefit-in-kind purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2021
First-tier Tribunal erred in law and HMRC’s discovery assessment was invalid
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020