This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Contingent consideration: Part of the consideration for a land transaction was contingent

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021

An appeal against HMRC’s refusal of a stamp duty land tax repayment claim was allowed, as part of the consideration for a land transaction under a sale agreement that was not subsequently paid was held to be contingent.   

The appellant (PBL) was a special purpose vehicle incorporated for the purpose of purchasing and holding (but not developing) Chelsea barracks. PBL purchased the barracks from the Ministry of Defence (MoD) through a sealed bid deadline tender process at a price of £959 million. It exchanged contracts with the Secretary of State for Defence on 5 April 2007. A 20% deposit of £191,800,000 was paid on exchange of contracts. The balance of the price was to be paid in four equal tranches of £191,800,000 payable on 31 January 2008, 2 February 2009, 1 February 2010 and 31 January 2011. Completion of the purchase was postponed by the contract until 31 January 2008 to allow the MoD to re-house troops from the barracks.

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Annexe to main house was suitable for use as a separate dwelling and multiple dwellings relief applied
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026
Partly completed development was residential property at the effective date of the transaction
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025
Tribunal had no jurisdiction in appeal against late payment interest
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021
Late payment of LTT was not attributable to the Coronavirus pandemic
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021
Company acquired a residential property for development purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021