This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Coronavirus job retention scheme: CJRS payments were not due as director continued working during furlough

By Mark McLaughlin, April 2025

The appellant company was not entitled to CJRS payments as the relevant conditions were found not to have been satisfied, including that the company’s sole director had worked throughout lockdown. 

The appellant company (SWG) had a sole director shareholder (SG). SWG provided services repairing and maintaining injection moulding machines, either in person via visits to the clients’ premises, or remotely online. SWG’s operations continued normally until the Coronavirus lockdown was announced on 23 March 2020. The business then came to a standstill for a few days, after which SG began taking calls from customers and providing help and advice remotely. He admitted to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) that he worked for around 18 hours between the beginning of lockdown and 30 April 2020. 

Following a compliance check into SWG’s Coronavirus job retention scheme (CJRS) claims, HMRC issued assessments to recover amounts

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Judicial review application against HMRC’s decision on double taxation treaty residence issue refused
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
HMRC was not required to notify liability to a charge
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2025
Company director was not personally liable for company’s unpaid income tax and NICs liabilities
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2025
Payment following termination of share options did not attract relief on the first £30,000
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2023
Appeal against tax assessments stayed behind assessments against information notices
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2023