This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Coronavirus job retention scheme: CJRS payments were not due as director continued working during furlough

By Mark McLaughlin, April 2025

The appellant company was not entitled to CJRS payments as the relevant conditions were found not to have been satisfied, including that the company’s sole director had worked throughout lockdown. 

The appellant company (SWG) had a sole director shareholder (SG). SWG provided services repairing and maintaining injection moulding machines, either in person via visits to the clients’ premises, or remotely online. SWG’s operations continued normally until the Coronavirus lockdown was announced on 23 March 2020. The business then came to a standstill for a few days, after which SG began taking calls from customers and providing help and advice remotely. He admitted to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) that he worked for around 18 hours between the beginning of lockdown and 30 April 2020. 

Following a compliance check into SWG’s Coronavirus job retention scheme (CJRS) claims, HMRC issued assessments to recover amounts

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Company pension provisions were not wholly and exclusively for trading purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2024
Taxpayer’s successful challenge to the disclosure of certain documents to another taxpayer overturned
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2023
LLPs weren't entitled to EZAs on relevant interests in buildings
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022
Ignorance of the law was a reasonable excuse for penalty purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2020
Compensation and interest were revenue receipts
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2020