This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Judicial review application against HMRC’s decision on double taxation treaty residence issue refused

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026

The High Court dismissed the taxpayer’s judicial review claim against a decision made by HMRC on the taxpayer’s residence status under the double taxation agreement between the UK and Spain, as the nature and form of HMRC’s decision meant it was not amenable to judicial review. 

The claimant was resident for tax purposes in both England and Spain under their respective domestic laws for the tax years 2006/07 to 2020/21 (inclusive). In those circumstances, the claimant’s treaty residence was to be determined by Article 4(2) of the UK-Spain double taxation agreement (DTA) using the three sequential ‘tie-breaker’ tests, failing which ‘the competent authorities of the Contracting States shall settle the question by mutual agreement’ (Article 4(2)(d)). The claimant claimed that an unlawful decision was made by HM&nbsp

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Travel expenses were not deductible as they were for ordinary commuting
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2026
Employer’s PILON payment to employee was taxable as payment motive was separate from employee’s disability
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
Taxpayer’s misinterpretation of HMRC letter did not constitute a reasonable excuse
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Discovery assessments in respect of contractor EBT loan arrangements were validly made
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021
Bonus scheme payments were general earnings and not termination payments
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2020