This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Deeds of appointment that had unintended legal and tax effects could be rectified

By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021

The High Court granted rectification of two deeds of appointment as they mistakenly (and unnecessarily) included provisions which terminated the claimant’s existing interests in possession and appointed new ones in their place when the deeds were only intended to add certain persons as additional default beneficiaries. 

Summary 

The High Court granted rectification of two deeds of appointment as they mistakenly (and unnecessarily) included provisions which terminated the claimant’s existing interests in possession and appointed new ones in their place when the deeds were only intended to add certain persons as additional default beneficiaries. 

Background 

On 21 October 2003, the claimant’s father died. His will left his half share in the matrimonial home (CH) and his residuary

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Fishery business was not eligible for relief
By Arthur Weller, December 2024
Transfer of reversionary interest did not involve excluded transfer
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2023
Beneficial interest in a property was not held by uncle and nephew in equal shares as tenants in common
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021
Furnished holiday lettings business was not relevant business property
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2021
Deceased’s executor refused permission to make a late appeal against an IHT determination
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2020