This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Did the appellant have a reasonable excuse for issuing a zero-rating certificate in error?

By Andrew Needham, February 2020

This appeal was against a decision by HMRC to issue the appellant with a penalty under VATA 1994, s 62(1) and (2) in the sum of £20, 937.

The penalty arose from the decision by the appellant to issue a zero-rating certificate to Atkinson Builders Ltd on 9 March 2013, in relation to supplies to it during the course of the construction of a new pavilion.

Background

The only issue before the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT)was whether or not the appellant could prove to the requisite standard that it had a reasonable excuse for issuing the zero-rating certificate, it having been conceded that the appellant ought not to have issued the zero-rating certificate.

The appellant was a cricket club run by unpaid volunteers with a love for village cricket. Mr Kellock had been its treasurer since around

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was the appellant careless in their actions and were there special circumstances?
By Andrew Needham, April 2020
Westow Cricket Club - Did the appellant have a reasonable excuse for issuing a zero-rating certificate in error?
By Andrew Needham, March 2020
Was an officer of the company personally liable to a penalty for deliberate and concealed failure to notify?
By Andrew Needham, August 2019
Had HMRC Imposed The Correct Level Of Penalties And Did Zero-Rating Apply From The Date Planning Permission Was Granted Or The Retrospective Date Granted?
By Andrew Needham, May 2017
Was The Error ‘Careless’ Or ‘Deliberate And Concealed’ And Were The Full Levels Of Co-operation Taken Into Account?
By Andrew Needham, May 2015