This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was an officer of the company personally liable to a penalty for deliberate and concealed failure to notify?

By Andrew Needham, August 2019

This was an appeal by an individual against a personal liability notice for a penalty imposed on a company he worked for.

Between 2013-2017, the appellant worked for a company called Newham Pizza Limited (‘Newham’), which operated a pizza franchise in East London.

Following an investigation, HMRC concluded that the takings had been suppressed and that Newham should have been registered for VAT from early 2014. HMRC imposed a penalty on Newham of £138,692.40 under FA 2008, Sch 41 (‘Schedule 41’) in respect of its failure to notify HMRC of its obligation to register for VAT.

As HMRC had been informed that an application had been made to strike the company off the Companies House register, HMRC also sent personal liability notices to Newham’s director, Mr Abdul Munaim and to the appellant, making each of them

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was the appellant careless in their actions and were there special circumstances?
By Andrew Needham, April 2020
Westow Cricket Club - Did the appellant have a reasonable excuse for issuing a zero-rating certificate in error?
By Andrew Needham, March 2020
Did the appellant have a reasonable excuse for issuing a zero-rating certificate in error?
By Andrew Needham, February 2020
Had HMRC Imposed The Correct Level Of Penalties And Did Zero-Rating Apply From The Date Planning Permission Was Granted Or The Retrospective Date Granted?
By Andrew Needham, May 2017
Was The Error ‘Careless’ Or ‘Deliberate And Concealed’ And Were The Full Levels Of Co-operation Taken Into Account?
By Andrew Needham, May 2015