This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Evidence for deduction of input tax, penalty for deliberate inaccuracy and personal liability notice.

By Andrew Needham, October 2023

Summary

This appeal concerned the application of the Tour Operators Margin Scheme (TOMS) to self-contained apartments which the appellant had leased from third-party landlords and sublet the apartments to travellers for different periods from a single night to a month or more. HMRC had ruled that it was not applicable, and the appellant appealed that decision.

Background

The provision of holiday accommodation is subject to standard-rated VAT at 20%. If TOMS can be used, then the amount of VAT payable is significantly reduced because under TOMS the business pays VAT only on the margin, which is the difference between the selling price and the direct costs of the accommodation, including rent, cleaning, etc. Under TOMS, VAT is due at 1/6th of the margin where the accommodation is in the UK.

HMRC contended that the supply by the landlord was not on-supplied by the appellant or, if it was, it was materially

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Supply for consideration: was grant-funded income for the provision of education a supply of services for consideration?
By Andrew Needham, February 2025
Were the errors in the use of the margin scheme deliberate and was the director personally responsible?
By Andrew Needham, October 2024
Were the appellants liable to a penalty and were personal liability notices appropriate?
By Andrew Needham, November 2023
Option to tax: Was there a valid option to tax in place?
By Andrew Needham, June 2023
Were claims for mis sold PPI within the insurance exemption?
By Andrew Needham, October 2021