This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Were claims for mis sold PPI within the insurance exemption?

By Andrew Needham, October 2021

The appellant made claims on behalf of individual customers who have been mis-sold payment protection insurance (‘PPI’) by financial institutions. When those claims were successful, compensation was paid to the appellant’s customers and the appellant received a fee for its services, which was calculated as a percentage of the compensation paid to the customer. This was an appeal from the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) relating to decisions of HMRC that the appellant (a) made supplies that were liable to VAT at the standard rate, and (b) should have been registered for VAT with effect from 1 June 2009. The issue before the FTTl was whether or not the supplies made by the appellant were exempt supplies of insurance under VATA 1994 Schedule 9 Group 2. 

The FTT decided that the appellant’s services fell outside the exemption

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were the supplies made by the appellant exempt supplies of domiciliary care or standard-rated supplies of staff subject to the reverse charge?
By Andrew Needham, April 2026
Was repayment supplement due on monies repaid to the appellant by HMRC or was repayment made within relevant period?
By Andrew Needham, February 2024
Was interest payable by HMRC on overpaid output tax paid on demonstrator bonuses?
By Andrew Needham, February 2023
Was the supply of car parking facilities by an NHS Trust a taxable supply?
By Andrew Needham, December 2022
Was VAT Only Due On ‘Commissions’ Received Or The Full Value Of The Sale?
By Andrew Needham, February 2019