This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was VAT Only Due On ‘Commissions’ Received Or The Full Value Of The Sale?

By Andrew Needham, February 2019

This was an appeal by the taxpayer against an assessment by HMRC for underdeclared output tax. 
 
HMRC assessed the appellant for over £900,000 on 100% of the sums of money it had received from students/clients whereas the appellant contested that VAT was only due on the commissions it received. In the alternative, the appellant argued that the assessment had been wrongly calculated as a number of clients were from outside the EU.  
 
The appellant’s business was essentially Internet-based. The appellant traded under various names, one of which was ‘UK Essays.com’, and those who would like to have an essay, dissertation or piece of coursework written for him/her could go onto the appellant’s website.  
 
The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) saw a hard copy of the website and was able to see that a potential client could choose a particular kind of service

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was the assessment made when the form was completed or when it had been checked and countersigned?
By Andrew Needham, August 2025
Had the appellant undeclared cash sales?
By Andrew Needham, September 2021
Was input tax on building works recoverable by the appellant?
By Andrew Needham, July 2021
Assessment for underdeclared output tax:  Was the business trading and was the assessment to best judgement?
By Andrew Needham, August 2020
Was HMRC able to impose a security on a company without giving any reasons? 
By Andrew Needham, September 2019