This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Were hair transplants a medical procedure or a cosmetic process?

By Andrew Needham, April 2025

This was an appeal against a decision that the majority of the appellants’ supplies of hair transplant services were subject to standard-rated VAT, that they should have been registered for VAT from July 2007, an assessment for £2,498,232 and a penalty for £374,734. The appellant appealed on the grounds that it made exempt supplies of medical services. 

HMRC withdrew the penalty assessment following evidence of an exchange of emails between HMRC and the appellant's advisors, which indicated that the medical exemption did apply and that the appellant had a reasonable excuse for late registration. 

The appellant offered a range of services in the treatment of hair loss, including hair transplants. A number of case studies were presented to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) in order to assist it in reaching its conclusions. None of the cases cited problems with thermoregulation or sun protection as factors which led the

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Were the drugs for personal use by the patients and therefore zero-rated?
By Andrew Needham, August 2025
Was the assessment made when the form was completed or when it had been checked and countersigned?
By Andrew Needham, August 2025
Was there still an appealable matter after the withdrawal of assessments?
By Andrew Needham, February 2025
Was the appellant entitled to a repayment from HMRC for historical VAT on historical bad debts that it stated it had not claimed?
By Andrew Needham, May 2023
Was the adaptation of Merlin helicopters to use early warning radar a supply of goods or services?
By Andrew Needham, February 2022