This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the supply of prescription drugs and contraceptives a separate taxable supply or part of an exempt composite supply of healthcare?

By Andrew Needham, September 2024

This was an appeal from the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) to the Upper Tribunal (UT) concerning the application of the medical exemption. The appellant provided various healthcare services in prisons in England pursuant to a contract with NHS England ("NHSE"). The appellant argued that its supplies of prescription drugs and non-prescribed contraceptives are separate non-exempt supplies subject to VAT at the zero and lower rate of VAT, entitling it to register for VAT and recover input tax on these purchases.  

The FTT decided that the appellant made a single exempt composite supply of "primary healthcare or health and social care" services. The FTT went on to make findings regarding the procurement and bidding process for the contract, detailing the invitations to tender, and service specifications. The specification included a reference to medical services being "delivered as part of an Integrated Primary Care Service…"

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Should the appellant have known that some of its transactions were connected with fraud and should it have been able to recover the input tax charged?
By Andrew Needham, June 2026
Was there still an appealable matter after the withdrawal of assessments?
By Andrew Needham, February 2025
Did the appellant have a reasonable excuse for submitting the appeal late?
By Andrew Needham, January 2025
Was the appellant required to register and account for VAT in the UK on mail order sales to UK customers?
By Andrew Needham, February 2021
Bad debt relief: Was the appellant entitled to adjust its daily gross takings figure more than four years after the debt became due?
By Andrew Needham, February 2020