This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Was the separate hire of a car seat a separate supply from the hire of the car?

By Andrew Needham, September 2020

This appeal concerned whether the letting of a car with a child car seat by the appellant, a car rental company was, for VAT purposes, a single composite supply, as HMRC contended, or separate supplies of the car (standard rated) and the car seat (reduced rate of 5%), as the appellant contended. 

Summary 

This appeal concerned whether the letting of a car with a child car seat by the appellant, a car rental company was, for VAT purposes, a single composite supply, as HMRC contended, or separate supplies of the car (standard rated) and the car seat (reduced rate of 5%), as the appellant contended. 

Background 

HMRC refused a voluntary disclosure seeking repayment of overpaid output tax during the period 1 October 2008 to 31 December 2015 in the total sum of £631,178 submitted by the appellant. 

 A car hirer could, as an optional extra, hire a

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Evidence for deduction of input tax, penalty for deliberate inaccuracy and personal liability notice.
By Andrew Needham, October 2023
Was input tax fully recoverable when a taxpayer received subsidies?
By Andrew Needham, August 2021
Was the appellant required to register and account for VAT in the UK on mail order sales to UK customers?
By Andrew Needham, February 2021
Was there a supply of staff to the Appellant or were they actually employees?
By Andrew Needham, November 2020
Bad debt relief: Was the appellant entitled to adjust its daily gross takings figure more than four years after the debt became due?
By Andrew Needham, February 2020